How Can Municipal Utilities and Distribution Grid Operators Preserve Their Ability to Act?

Meeting climate targets and complying with evolving policy and regulatory requirements will require district heating, electricity, and natural gas providers to make substantial investments in the years ahead. Yet small and medium-sized municipal utilities often have limited access to capital, skilled labor, and management capacity. At the same time, they face considerable uncertainty regarding future policy and regulatory frameworks, technological developments, and customer behavior.

To address these challenges, we recommend a systematic, scenario-based approach. It enables utilities and distribution grid operators to manage uncertainty across three critical areas: their investment portfolio, workforce capabilities, and organizational leadership.

The Current Situation: A Significant Need for Action

The energy transition requires extensive action at the local level—and therefore substantial investment. Municipal utilities and distribution grid operators must reinforce electricity grids, transform gas networks, build new and retrofit existing district heating infrastructure, modernize generation assets, and further digitalize their operations.

Accordingly, nine out of ten German municipal utilities surveyed expect their investment requirements to increase significantly (source: BDEW and EY, 2026). One in four anticipates an increase of more than 200%.

Financing these investments will be a major challenge. Of the companies surveyed, 92% report that they can finance the necessary projects from their own resources only to a limited extent—or not at all.

Policy and regulatory uncertainty compound the problem. Among the municipal utilities surveyed, 90% consider political decisions a strategic risk, while 86% say the same about regulatory uncertainty. The shortage of skilled workers places additional pressure on organizations and their ability to deliver complex transformation programs.

Customer behavior is also changing. Many customers place increasing value on a climate-friendly energy supply while seeking greater control over—and, in some cases, greater independence in—their own energy provision.

Taken together, these developments create a complex management challenge. Municipal utilities and distribution grid operators must structure their investments, capabilities, and organizations in ways that allow them to remain effective across a wide range of possible futures despite high levels of uncertainty.

Financing the Transformation Is Becoming More Difficult

Potential impairment charges, decommissioning costs, and declining earnings contributions from grid and retail operations are reducing utilities’ ability to finance investments from their own resources. In particular, the contraction—and potential long-term phaseout—of the natural gas business is likely to weaken profitability.

At the same time, new electricity, heating, and digitalization projects require additional capital, while municipalities have less capacity to provide equity contributions or investment grants to municipally owned companies.

Utilities also face growing competition for capital. The energy transition is generating financing needs in the trillions, particularly for industrial transformation and the decarbonization of the building stock. Investments in energy generation and electricity, district heating, and gas networks must therefore compete with numerous other funding requirements in the capital markets.

Investment Portfolios Must Remain Viable Across Multiple Futures

The investments required for the energy transition will tie up substantial amounts of capital for decades. Although the need for investment is both high and urgent, utilities and distribution grid operators must avoid committing scarce resources to assets that could become underutilized or obsolete.

Established planning methods—typically based on the incremental expansion of existing grids and relatively predictable demand—are no longer sufficient. They cannot adequately account for the much greater uncertainty surrounding regulation, customer behavior, market developments, and technological change.

We therefore recommend a fundamental methodological shift: from extrapolating existing trends to predict a single expected future, to planning across multiple scenarios.

The first step is to identify the key factors that will shape future developments. These may include:

• Policy and regulatory changes

• The scale and pace of electrification in transportation and heating

• Critical technological advances

• Changes in customer behavior and demand

• Regional economic and demographic trends

Based on these factors, utilities and distribution grid operators should develop at least three plausible scenarios.

For each scenario, they should then assess expected demand, capital requirements, workforce needs, and the necessary technical and organizational capabilities. This approach helps distinguish among verified facts, working assumptions, and unresolved questions. It also highlights where management still has room to maneuver.

The critical question is not which scenario will unfold exactly as anticipated. Rather, it is which investments will remain viable across several plausible futures. This results in three broad categories:

• Robust investments create value across all plausible scenarios. Examples may include grid monitoring and control systems, the digitalization of grid operations, targeted reinforcement of critical sections of electricity and district heating networks, and local renewable energy generation.

• Scalable investments begin with limited, modular steps and can be expanded as demand and market developments become clearer. Examples may include the phased expansion of district heating networks or the gradual development of electric vehicle charging infrastructure.

• Strategic commitments deliberately tie up capital when further delay is no longer feasible or would become excessively costly. These decisions require explicit assumptions, predefined review points, and clear exit criteria. Examples may include the decommissioning of gas networks or the development of hydrogen infrastructure.

Each investment decision should be supported by a consistent set of criteria, including:

• Capital requirements

• Urgency

• Irreversibility

• Workforce and capability requirements

• Strategic relevance

• Customer value

• Financial impact

• Viability across scenarios

The result is a transparent portfolio of investment initiatives in which uncertainty, benefits, risks, and costs have been systematically assessed. Utilities can then focus their limited financial and management resources on the projects that are both most important and most resilient.

Labor Shortages Require Deliberate Capability Management

Labor shortages are not merely a matter of workforce size. The more important question is whether utilities and distribution grid operators have access to the right capabilities at the right time.

In addition to technical expertise, regulatory, financial, commercial, and methodological capabilities are becoming increasingly important. Employees and managers must be able to evaluate scenarios, make assumptions transparent, assess risks, and revise decisions as new information becomes available.

These capabilities cannot be secured through recruitment alone. In a tight labor market, utilities must systematically develop their existing workforce while determining which capabilities can be shared or sourced externally.

We recommend a three-step approach:

1. Define the capabilities that must remain in-house.
   These typically include critical operational knowledge, core management capabilities, system responsibility, and accountability for critical infrastructure.

2. Identify capabilities that can be shared or sourced externally.
   Specialized expertise that is required only occasionally may be organized in partnership with other companies. Regional planning teams, shared-service organizations, joint project companies, and coordinated procurement initiatives can help utilities access scarce capabilities more efficiently.

3. Link capability building to real-world decisions.
   Practical case studies, simulations, and on-the-job learning generally produce stronger and more lasting results than broad, stand-alone training programs.

This approach allows utilities and distribution grid operators to focus their internal resources on strategically critical capabilities while using partnerships and external expertise more selectively.

Leadership Must Provide Clarity About the Direction and Decision-Making Framework

Employees experience transformation through changing priorities, roles, responsibilities, and job requirements. These changes can create professional uncertainty, concerns about status and career prospects, or a sense of being overwhelmed.

Leaders cannot eliminate uncertainty through isolated announcements or overly reassuring promises. They can, however, provide direction by clearly communicating what is known, what is assumed, and what remains unresolved.

A useful communication framework distinguishes among:

• Facts: verified information and confirmed decisions

• Assumptions: the current basis for planning and decision-making

• Open questions: issues that require further monitoring, analysis, or review

This distinction improves communication quality and gives employees a clearer sense of direction. It shows which decisions are firm, which may still be adjusted, and which external developments could trigger a reassessment.

Leadership should also create an environment in which employees can openly challenge assumptions and decisions. Technical concerns, potential errors in data or underlying assumptions, and differing views of future developments should be raised as early and transparently as possible.

This makes uncertainty visible, discussable, and manageable. It can accelerate decision-making, reduce avoidable risks, and improve the quality of strategic and operational choices.

What Needs to be Done Now: Translate Strategic Foresight into Action

Scenario-based strategy should be closely integrated with capability development and supported by a leadership model suited to decision-making under uncertainty.

Within the next three months, senior management should take the following seven steps:

1. Identify the critical decisions that must be made over the next three to five years.

2. Document the decision framework for each issue, including verified facts, underlying assumptions, open questions, review points, and exit criteria.

3. Develop at least three plausible scenarios based on different assumptions about market trends, regulation, technology, and customer behavior.

4. Prioritize investment decisions based on their robustness across scenarios, urgency, capital requirements, workforce needs, and strategic relevance.

5. Assess the financial implications of each scenario, including the impact on earnings contributions, cash flow, debt capacity, and potential funding requirements from municipal shareholders.

6. Determine the capabilities required for implementation and translate identified gaps into concrete workforce development and recruitment measures.

7. Align leadership and communication practices with the strategic direction and explain the decision-making framework in a way that is transparent and understandable to all relevant stakeholders.

Combining scenario-based decision-making with systematic capability management and leadership practices designed for uncertain conditions can help municipal utilities and distribution grid operators prepare for the challenges ahead.

This approach cannot eliminate uncertainty. It can, however, create the strategic resilience, financial discipline, organizational capabilities, and leadership clarity required to preserve the ability to act.

We would be pleased to support you on this journey.

Back to Publications